Pages

Monday, 5 January 2015

Japanese Woodblock Printing with Jennifer Lynch

Above: Tokuriki, Tomikichiro, The Cherry Blossoms of Mt. Shigi in Nara Prefecture (The Eight Views of Japan), n.d. (c. 1950s), Color woodblock print (oban). Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago, Gift of Brenda F. and Joseph V. Smith, 2004.178b.
Helloooo everyone! First of all Happy New Year! I haven't been able to post for a while because of my Christmas painting commissions, which I will post onto my personal blog (I'll attach the link below).

So, this post will be an introduction on Japanese Woodblock Printing that I had experienced today with Jennifer Lynch. I will be listing the main genres and terms of printing and their translations, a step by step process with the use of materials, techniques and processes with some examples of each in traditional Japanese prints and comparing and contrasting them with contemporary Japanese art.


Woodblock prints were initially used as early as the eighth century in Japan to disseminate texts, especially Buddhist scriptures. The designer and painter Tawaraya Sotatsu (died ca. 1640) used wood stamps in the early seventeenth century to print designs on paper and silk. Until the eighteenth century, however, woodblock printing remained primarily a convenient method of reproducing written texts.


In 1765, new technology made it possible to produce single-sheet prints in a whole range of colors. Printmakers who had heretofore worked in monochrome and painted the colors in by hand, or had printed only a few colors, gradually came to use full polychrome painting to spectacular effect. The first polychrome prints, or nishiki-e, were calendars made on commission for a group of wealthy patrons in Edo, where it was the custom to exchange beautifully designed calendars at the beginning of the year.

A woodblock print image is first designed by the artist on paper and then transferred to a thin, partly transparent paper. Following the lines on the paper, now pasted to a wooden block usually of cherry wood, the carver chisels and cuts to create the original in negative—with the lines and areas to be colored raised in relief. Ink is applied to the surface of the woodblock. Rubbing a round pad over the back of a piece of paper laid over the top of the inked board makes a print.

Polychrome prints were made using a separate carved block for each color, which could number up to twenty. To print with precision using numerous blocks on a single paper sheet, a system of placing two cuts on the edge of each block to serve as alignment guides was employed. Paper made from the inner bark of mulberry trees was favored, as it was strong enough to withstand numerous rubbings on the various woodblocks and sufficiently absorbent to take up the ink and pigments. Reproductions, sometimes numbering in the thousands, could be made until the carvings on the woodblocks became worn.

Technical Print Terms

Ehon – ‘Picture books’
Hōsho – ‘Presentation paper’ a high quality paper
Mino paper – popular paper for prints before full colour printing was invented
Chūban – ‘Medium format’
Hashira-e – ‘Pillar pictures’ long, narrow format
Koban – ‘Small format’
Ōban – ‘Large format’
Nishiki-e – ‘Brocade pictures’ full colour prints

Sumizuri-e – prints made entirely with black ink

Print Genres

Ukiyo-e – ‘Pictures of the Floating World’
Bijinga – ‘Pictures of Beautiful Women’
Fūkei-ga – Images of landscapes
•Historical and Mythological
Kachô-e – Images of birds and flowers
Okubi-e – ‘Large Head Pictures’ bust portraits
Shunga – ‘Spring Pictures’
Yakusha-e – Kabuki actor prints

Surimono – privately published prints not sold to the general public

Production of Japanese Prints


The production of classic Japanese woodblock prints is a fairly complex process, involving a number of steps, each usually performed by a different person, one skilled in that particular step.I say "classic" because in the modern Japanese print movement, often the artist performs all the steps themselves. However, while classic Japanese prints were sometimes produced in limited editions as 'high art', more usually they were produced in far larger editions as popular, mass-produced art, art that was originally intended to be transitory.

As such, the production process rapidly evolved into one with various specialties, and during the hey-day of ukiyo-e, it was not uncommon for different steps to be performed in different establishments, each with a particular speciality.

The artist would start by producing a preparatory sketch (gako), with the most detail in areas like faces, etc. He (and it was usually a 'he', although a few female woodblock artists are known from the pre-Meiji period) would make alterations and corrections by gluing new paper over the desired areas.
The artist would then pass this drawing to a block-copyist, who then made an elaborated final copy, a very fine black and white paper drawing, the hanshita-e ('under-drawing', sometimes given as shita-e) on very thin mino paper, which showed the (usually black) lines which outlined everything in the image. (This copying process explains why so many original sketches for prints are still extant, since thehanshita-e was destroyed in the process of creating the blocks, as we will see.)
The completed drawing would then be shown to the official censors, and after being passed, it would go to a carver, who specialized in carving the blocks used to produce the print. 



        The Printers

The third set of artisans were the printers, skilled in making the inks (both vegetable and mineral inks were used), and applying them, especially to get the shading (called bokashi).
The grinding of pigments was one of the steps traineee printers had to master; each was kept in its own porcelain bowl, and before use a few drops of water would be added to produce exactly the right consistency. Also, a stack of one of two kinds of mulberry (kozo) paper would be slightly moistened, and laid ready to hand. 

The printing was done in fairly straightforward fashion; ink was applied to the block, which was face up, using brushes (hake) made from a horse's mane. Rice-starch was sometimes added to the block, to give better adhesion and color depth. 
The paper was then laid down on the block, using the kento to line it up, and the ink was rubbed onto the paper using a circular or semi-circular motion. 

The rubbing was done using a baren, a large circular flat pad, usually made of a bamboo sheath wrapped around a lacquered cover over a flat coil of straw and/or bamboo fiber, or some similar material; the strands of the coiled fiber produced an uneven surface which was important in pressing the ink into the paper.


The shading (called bokashi) is produced by a number of different techniques, such as:
    • wiping the blocks with a cotton cloth or pad after the application of the ink;
    • using brushes with varying color intensity and moisture level;
    • rubbing the block with a damp cloth before applying the ink.

Repeat Printing

Actually, sometimes a block would get used more than once, as partial (i.e. the block is not completely inked, but only in one area, with a shading out to no ink on other parts of the block) overprints of an emphasis color.

Ironically, it appears that this technique appeared in response to sumptuary regulations passed by the Tokugawa Shogunate during the Tempo Reforms of the early 1840's, which limited the number of blocks which could be used in making prints!

You can see this technique being used in many prints, especially ones that show sky or water; in the middle or the edge of the water, which is generally light blue, there will be a band of dark blue water. This whole area would have originally been printed in the light blue ground color, and then that part overprinted in the deeper blue.


It can get even more complex, though. It is fairly common to take a block which is used to print a basic sky color (e.g. light blue-grey), and overprint with it twice after the initial printing; the first time with a one accent color (e.g. deeper blue) along the lower edge, and the second with another accent color (e.g. a black) along the upper edge. Even so, a complete print can use a large number of blocks.

Note that in a number of stages, a block which was used in a previous stage is used again, to overprint an accent color, always using bokashi to grade it in.
Even with the repeat printing, the little book used 10 blocks, with two being overprinted twice, for a total of 14 separate printing stages.

The process starts with the key block (note that for this, as well as all the images below, you can get a larger image by clicking on the image):

Key Block

Now we add the rest of the blocks:
StagePrint BlockCumulative Print
1 - Brown1st StageStage 1
2 - Pinkish Brown2nd StageStage 2
3 - Grey3rd StageStage 3
4 - Bluish Grey4th StageStage 4
5 - Light Blue5th StageStage 5
6 - Grey (same color as stage 3)6th StageStage 6
7 - Dark Blue (same block as stage 5)7th StageStage 7
8 - Dark Blue (same block as stage 5)8th StageStage 8
9 - Grey-Blue9th StageStage 9
10 - Green10th StageStage 10
11 - Light Blue (same block as stage 9)11th StageStage 11
12 - Black (same block as stage 9)12th StageStage 12
13 - Red13th StageStage 13


New Prints and Contemporary Woodblock artists

When the traditional art of the Japanese color woodblock print was pushed near extinction at the turn of the twentieth century, a few enterprising young artists and publishers revived the old-fashioned art form. These shin hanga or "new prints" maintained traditional methods and depicted traditional birds, flowers, and landscapes, but this long-established art found a new audience in Western collectors attracted by the powerful and alluring images of Japan. Wildly popular in Europe and the United States, many of these prints were created for sale abroad and even designed with foreign tastes in mind. This exhibition brought together a selection of fukeiga(landscapes) and kachoga (bird and flower) shin hanga from the Smart Museum's collection.
The Ronin Gallery in New York displays many of the modern and traditional woodblock prints check out their website: http://www.japancollection.com/japanese-prints-home.php 

Contemporary Artist- Ralph Kiggell


Artist: Ralph KiggellTitle: Orb
Year: 2011Technique: Woodblock print on Japanese handmade paper, ed 8
Size: 180 x 180 cm (6 pieces)Price: US$ 4,200

A modern and contemporary artist: Ralph Kiggell still uses the traditional woodblock printing
methods in his work today. 
Ralph Kiggell is an English artist who lives in Thailand most of the time.  He was born in 1960 and 
completed a BA at the School of Oriental and African Studies, London, before pursuing his art 
studies in Japan.  In Japan, he studied Ukiyoe printmaking at the famous Yoshida print studio. He 
then researched contemporary woodblock printing and related techniques at Kyoto Seika University 
before completing an MA in printmaking at Tama Art University in Tokyo. Kiggell has long been 
fascinated by the Japanese woodblock print and has experimented and developed his own methods 
and techniques based on Japanese traditions.
 His current works are hand printed on Japanese hand made paper with his own mix of Japanese 
pigments.  He says: "The most important reason why I like woodblock printing is that it uses natural 
materials and is sensitive to the environment. 
The second is that I was interested in the Japanese aesthetic, which is superbly represented in 
Japanese woodblock prints of the last 400 years. Thirdly, as any artist who has printed knows, there 
is something compelling about carving a design on one material and transferring it to another."   
Kiggell has completed two recent major projects: colourium and second nature, in which he focuses 
on nature and on animals and objects that fascinate him.
To see more of his works visit: www.ralphkiggell.com/  

Monday, 1 December 2014

Fauvism Expressed

Fauvism Expressed


Hellooo :) This blog post will entail a thorough report on an art movement called The Fauvism/ Fauves. It will also conclude the different artists that were protagonists of the movement for example; Matisse, Picasso and Andre Derain… Hence others areas that will surround the topic of discussion; such as style, history of the Fauves, reasons why it came about and how Fauvism developed onto a later date. In the main body of the dissertation I will gather and organise what exactly is meant by Fauvism and how it has developed on to artists to produce this style of art. I will then be discussing thoroughly my opinions as well as influences and comparisons between artists and most of all how it has impacted onto other movements.

Introduction to Fauvism:

Fauvism was explained as the first of the major avant-garde movements in European 20th century art, Fauvism was characterised by paintings that used intensely vivid, non-naturalistic and lavish colours.
Fauvism doesn't seem that radical, but at the time, it was a cutting edge movement; its very name, Fauvism, comes from the French word fauves meaning "wild beasts."


To truly understand Fauvism and its impact, you must understand its roots. Impressionism, made famous by painters like Monet, dominated paintings in the late 1800's. Impressionists used broken brush strokes and small dabs of colour to portray brief glimpses of their subjects; they showed how something looks when a certain light hits it. They painted modern life, the cities, people and landscapes around them. Fauvism took some of these ideas and exploded them, meanwhile ignoring others. Fauvists made bolder, vigorous and even violent brush strokes. Their work showed passion and enthusiasm, and they applied the same zest to colour. Fauvists used colour to express emotion about their subjects, not to show them realistically. In my opinion I would say that Fauvism acted as a rebellion towards other movements ‘Impressionism – Post’ to show another type of style within and how they could create something that had influenced them in the first place. 

The leading artists involved were Henri Matisse, Andre Derain, Raoul Dufy, George Braque, and Vlaminck. A signature trademark of Fauvism was contrasting colours, taken from opposite sides of the colour wheel. A good example is Henri Matisse's "Dance (II)" (1910), showing a ring of naked bodies in rich, earthy-rusty-orange (quite striking against a deep blue sky and vibrant green ground) rather than the softer, peachy skin tones he'd used in the original work, "Dance" in 1909.


Although Fauvism was short-lived (1905-08), it was extremely influential in the evolution of 20th century art.  
The Dance (II) 1910


Artists in Fauvism:

The Open Window- Collioure 1905
Henri Matisse was one of the Fauvist Artists during the movement in 1905. It was actually this artist that started the movement along with Andre Derain. 

At first glance, the apparent freedom of his style seems to deny any skill or technique, but when you begin to analyse his effective use of visual elements you start to realize that there is an instinctive sensibility at work. The key to his success in using such exaggerated colours was the realization that he had to simplify his drawing. I understand that if he intensified the quality of colour for expressive effect, it would then reduce the amount of detail used in drawing the shapes and forms of the image. 

By applying the same kind of simplification and spontaneity to his drawing and brushwork, Matisse was amplifying the sense of joy that he had achieved through colour.
He wrote, "We move towards serenity through the simplification of ideas and form.......Details lessen the purity of lines, they harm the emotional intensity, and we choose to reject them. It is a question of learning - and perhaps relearning the 'handwriting' of lines. The aim of painting is not to reflect history, because this can be found in books. We have a higher conception. Through it, the artist expresses his inner vision."  I think this quote actually impacted the way artists look at Fauvism today and in a way some parts of this quote resemble a teaching approach; as it says from lines 51 ‘The aim of the painting’… this line could actually teach those who want to try painting this movement or just to acknowledge them in how he expresses his style.

Rather than focusing on colour, Matisse aimed to create strikingly simple forms and figures, carefully balanced and with a distinct emphasis on movement and the expression contained within. This technique would be a major influence on Hans Hofmann and his development of the "push/pull" theory.  According to this theory, rather than representational forms, colour and form can create spacial depth and movement in a picture through traditional, linear perspective .
Andre Derain was the other artist in partnership in creating The Fauvism Art Movement.  Andre Derain was eventually recognized as the leader of Les Fauves, or "The Wild Beasts," and like the group, he emphasized the use of intense colour as a vehicle for describing light and space, as well as for communicating the artist's emotional state.

 In these regards, Fauvism proved to be an important precursor to Cubism and Expressionism, respectively, and an inspiration for future modes of abstraction.

In contrast to Henri Matisse, Andre Derain uses heavy brush strokes to create his expressive and descriptive qualities of colour in his work whereas Matisse uses colour at its maximum intensity, which explains why his painting looks slightly abstract with only one protagonist colour in this case red which is used frequently on the plant pots, and on the masts of the yachts. In my opinion I believe that he did this to complement the rest of the colours in the picture as well as to make a statement that these were the main objects that punctuate the painting. 
Derain’s style consists of using a conflict between warm and cool colours as well as using a heavy hand when perceiving the brush strokes he creates. It is said that this organized arrangement of tones in a landscape is called Aerial Perspective. This refers to a technique that was introduced in 1725, it is explained that this technique is used to create a perspective of depth in a painting by modifying the tone, hue or distinctness of objects identified from the picture.

Conclusion:

In conclusion I believe art movements are like a row of dominoes, each one impacting another as it moves, and Fauvism is no exception. The ‘Wild Beasts’ sprang from impressionist and post-impressionist influences, like Cezanne and Van Gogh and subsequently influenced other movements such as Abstract Impressionism and Surrealism.
Fauvism had an impact on other movements such as expressionism meaning that in time it had also influenced a mass number of single artists that were fascinated by the bold colorization that had begun to trend after the movement had taken place.

Friday, 21 November 2014

Contemporary Art: Barry Guppy


Ceramic tree bowls by Barry Guppy

I've just noticed this on The National Art Society's page and couldn't help but share it. Although I don't agree with some contemporary art, I found these just amazing! As most of you probably know from following my previous blog I am in love with any form of art with nature and trees.

http://www.studiopottery.co.uk/images/Barry/Guppy_(1937-2013)

Take a look at his collections above some beautiful ceramic pieces. His work styles included Porcelain, Paper Clay, and Sculptural installations.


2010. Grube Dish



Representation of the Figure during Renaissance Times

Fra Angelico- 'Deposition of Christ'
Helloo everyone!!

So the past couple of weeks I have been doing my own research on a couple of Renaissance paintings to start developing my picture and research analysis. Let me know what your input is on this! :)

As you can see the image on the left: Fra Angelico is an early Italian renaissance painter, his work reveals both conservatively Gothic and progressively renaissance. In the altarpiece ‘Deposition of Christ’ it shows Christ being carried, with Mary Magdalene kneeling at his feet this represents human preservation.


Giorgio Vasari defined it to have been “painted by a saint or an angel”.The human figure relations in this painting make it seem like a community because the way the figures are looking down with sincere may confirm an acquaintance or relationship with Christ. Also there are only few figures who have gold circular symbols on their heads, I think this is to separate the disciples from the persecutors. In the distance at the top left lies Jerusalem, shown by Angelico as a sparkling Tuscan hill town. The city fortifications appear as a series of cubes, pillars, and walls massed together in a sharply defining light. Buildings of widely varying sizes, shapes and colours are arranged together within the city walls.

Fra Angelico's Deposition demonstrates not only his skillful treatment of landscapes, but also figures, to which he often gave specific and presumably identifiable features. The man in the turban is likely a portrait of a person known to the artist. In this detail the towered buildings confirm the landscape as Italian. The hills stretch out into the distance, softened and smoothed by the light, peppered with gleaming villages and farmhouses. The foreground rocks are insufficiently distant to be mellowed, and are shown with all their facets and angularity. A row of trees again screens the landscape, emphasizing its distance.

Michelanglo- 'The dying slave'

Michelangelo was another Renaissance artist that expresses religion and symbolism within his work. “Michelangelo was a painter, sculptor, architect and poet and one of the great artists of the Italian Renaissance.” Michelangelo is widely regarded as the most famous artist of the Italian Renaissance. Among his works are the "David" and "Pieta" statues and the Sistine Chapel frescoes. 

From what I have sourced through research I have become to dislike Michelangelo’s work because mainly it is based upon the human figure and religion and with that I find boring unlike Botticelli he used the human figure to reflect upon beauty, love and mythological creatures. I also find that the use of sculptural work is really detailed compared to Dürer’s Adam and Eve but in this case his is an actual sculpture so the detail had to be fitting compared to on a canvas.
Michelangelo’s sculpture ‘The Dying Slave’ was created between 1513 and 1516. It was meant for the tomb of Julius II but was not included because of lack of space in the smaller version dedicated in 1545. The position of the slave seems uncomfortable with most of the weight converted to the right leg and the left arm out stretched to the back to the head makes it look like an awkward position to die. The stone entombing the back of the figure is a really interesting aspect of Michelangelo’s sculpture as it makes you think that the slave died in imprisoned in stone.


Sandro Botticelli- Birth of Venus

 In my opinion Sandro Botticelli was one of the greatest and most popular Italian masters of the late 15th century, not only can I admire the style and project the sense of spirituality in his work but by reviving the elements of Gothic art…A delicacy of sentiment, expresses in an ornament style that he entwined with freshness and beauty. Mainly his painted portraits have targeted many genres including religious, political, and mythological works full of allegory as well as symbolism.
Botticelli was influenced by a couple of Renaissance artists during the time of the period; strongly influenced by the precise anatomy draftsman ship of the brothers Pollaiuolo. Antonio Pollaiuolo (1432-1496) and Piero Pollaiuolo (1441-1496), both Florentine painters were famed for their innovation in painting the anatomy of figures. The Birth of Venus shows the Roman goddess of love and beauty rising from the sea on a sculpted sea shell or being pushed in by the zephyrs, personified on the left. In this painting Botticelli shows weight on his characters shows the probability that his art was committed to naturalism. But realistically given that her pose and weight is slanted onto the right leg you would know that the shell would tip. Also the only shadows or dark areas are the ones on the foreground of the painting and of the plants in the background which could only mean that the figures show no realism.

I think as well the painting shows unusual skeletal structure because the zephyrs are intertwined with each other which make the painting look twisted almost not realistic. Which will make me wonder if Botticelli was really committed to naturalism at all? Or maybe it was just a starting point to get the figures right. Although I really like this painting it points out a number of topics within; that make me sort of wonder whether this was actually based on the goddess of love or something entirely different. It makes me feel like you’re on a different plane because as you can see from the reflection of the waves, the flowing of the drapery, the exotic trees up ahead and the flowers flowing down form the zephyrs. It concludes an idyllic paradise like heaven or nature that is influenced by the floating characters proving this.
The Birth of Venus, focused on mythological subjects and populated figures of pagan gods, like Venus, Flora, Cupid, and Zephyr. In "The Birth of Venus," the figure of Venus represents the Virgin Mary as well, joining the religion of the day to mythology. Botticelli accepted paganism as a religion, and his religious paintings frequently manifest this by converging all truths into one.

Adam and Eve- Durer

Northern Renaissance art is commonly viewed as secondary to that of Renaissance Italy, with the notable exception of German artist Albrecht Dürer. Not also was he a skilled painter but he was also known in the field of engravings and woodcuts which shown increasingly popular at that time. His main influences started simply by following a technique introduced by Leonardo da Vinci by placing a body part at the front of the painting to intensify the illusion that the viewer is included in the painting.
 However, he does not use this technique in his ‘Eve’ painting which makes his work look differentiated in my opinion. The use of biblical reference is used heavily in this piece as he connects the story of ‘Adam and Eve’ to the other meanings of the fruit and snake in the picture. You can also recognize that eve is main protagonist of this painting as she is more illuminated than he. Dürer's fascination with ideal form is manifest in Adam and Eve. 

The first man and woman are shown in nearly symmetrical idealized poses: each with the weight on one leg, the other leg bent, and each with one arm angled slightly upward from the elbow and somewhat away from the body. The branch Adam holds is of the mountain ash, the Tree of Life, while the fig, of which Eve has broken off a branch, is the forbidden Tree of Knowledge. Four of the animals represent the medieval idea of the four temperaments: the cat is choleric, the rabbit sanguine, the ox phlegmatic, and the elk melancholic. Before the fall, these happenings were held in check, controlled by the innocence of man; once Adam and Eve ate from the apple of knowledge, all four were activated, all innocence lost.

I prefer this piece to Van Eyck’s because not only does it give the viewer something to think about but it’s also a famous piece for its biblical reference of creation. I especially like the monochrome effect and the detail of the engravings as it shows that Durer wanted the story to look realistic and it could also be used as a good example for teaching others the story too.


Jan Van Eyck was a Flemish painter that was responsible for the spread of the International Gothic Style and “is generally considered one of the most significant Northern European painters of the 15th century” Some believed he invented oil painting because his advanced use of the medium. In fact, this technique had been known since antiquity, but Van Eyck used it as never before to portray sensational lighting effects of clarity and realism.
His skillful development of oil’s translucent properties is explored on a variety of textures in his painting Dresden Triptych; the five individual panel paintings each show the biblical references of the assumption of Mary. The view of the inner wings of the triptych show the Archangel Gabriel present by a kneeling donor and on the right shows St Catherine of Alexandria reading a prayer book. These two outer wings contain an Annunciation scene in Grisaille which sums up the main scene in the middle which defines the Virgin Mary sitting while holding Christ on her lap. The center panel reminded me of how similar the woman looks to one of Van Eyck’s other paintings of ‘The Lucca Madonna’. It is said that The Lucca Madonna was thought to be a portrait of the artists’ wife, Margaret; which relates back to how Humanism was used in Renaissance times and the symbolism of a loved one. Given the scale of the piece “Dresden 33.1cm × 13.6cm; 33.1cm × 27.5cm; 33.1cm × 13.6cm" the triptych probably was a portable piece since members of the upper class acquired these through papal digression, which could only mean that the this was what the painting was for or Van Eyck was inspired to produce one. 
The colors and oil techniques used reminds me of the similars used on Dutch still life like the way they used bright colors to charm the human eye towards materialism and life (fruit) and color contrast the opposition to darker objects such as death (skulls) books etc. Although in Van Eyck’s work you can see that they use a similar style in their work such as concentrating the use of colors solely on the mood on the characters or objects present. In a style that depicts a sole portrayal of religious subjects I find that Van Eyck’s work shows the upper hand because not only is it presented in a form that can be used for travelling but it also has a meaning that it was used typically for religious visits.
Furthermore, when I first saw this piece it also made me think of an illuminated manuscript called The Aurora Consurgens. 

Although the illustrations are allegorical representations of alchemical elements, I know that this has nothing to do with the triptych or art within the Renaissance times but as a matter of fact I actually found a connection that they both used which was Humanism and alighting areas that show a purpose of a character (In Van Eyck’s work the Archangel Gabriel holding an illuminated spear of some sort and the tiny gold details within his armor). Instead of comparing people back in the middle ages to saints this manuscript depicts elements in human or animal form. For example, mercury is depicted as a serpent; gold as the Sun and silver as the Moon.








Thursday, 6 November 2014

The Walker Art Gallery!

The Ruin of Holyrood Chapel- Louis Daguerre

Hellooo everyone :)

I've decided to base this post on The Walker mainly because its the most visited art gallery I've been to ever since starting my History of Art course but also because I love The Walker in particular and this painting above all.

Most of my discussions will be taken from my personal research on the painting and research given from my presentation of 'My Favourite Artwork'.

Louis-Jacques-Mandé Daguerre is perhaps best known for his contribution to the history of photography. He invented the first photographic process, the daguerréotype in 1839. He worked in the studio of the stage designer for the Paris Opera, Ignace-Eugene-Marie Degotti as well as assisting Pierre Prévost in designing panorama paintings for public entertainment.
Daguerre established his reputation as a stage designer for Parisian theatres, especially with the development of dioramas. These were buildings designed by Daguerre for displaying his and Charles-Marie Bouton's huge paintings. Most of the themes of the paintings were landscapes, chapel interiors and volcanoes.

Daguerre's fascination with dioramas stemmed from his interest in finding appropriate ways of capturing light and atmospheric effects in painting, as well as making perspective an expressive and dramatic medium. The increasing taste for travelling and particularly visiting ruins and picturesque sites in the 18th century made Daguerre's dioramas particularly popular among the people of his time. For those who did not have the chance to travel, dioramas offered an experience close to a real visit, while for the privileged it helped revive their memories.


The painting was made with oil onto thin linen and then stretched onto a canvas. Lighting was used at the back of the picture to distinguish gradual passage from natural to evening light.


His techniques to create the general effect of light and shadows is distributed with using many layers of oil paint on a dry brush for the refined pile and detached parts of the Gothic architecture. You can see that light is perceived through blobbing the white paint of areas in which the moonlight falls upon. He also uses oil paint thinly as a wash to illustrate the dark clouds being illuminated by the moonlights flash effect on the right hand side of the picture.


Perhaps the moonlight scene is better calculated than any other to calculate to display the ingenious application of the scientific principles upon which the diorama is constructed, from its harmony with the tone of coldness and transparency.

The chapel is a oblong Gothic pile, which originally formed the ancient abbey. 
The under range of the flying buttresses at the south side still remains, as well as the more upright ones, with canopied niches and pinnacles on the north wall.
At the extremity of the picture is a large eastern window, which occupies the only remaining one of the four large arches that once supported the central tower of the church, and behind which the moon rises, and lights apart of the picture.

Through the arches are the corners of the Southern bile, the windows which overlook the cloister, and an arcade of small pillars and pointed arches speak for themselves of Gothic exterior. This confined pile still contains in many of its detached parts some elegant remains of Gothic Architecture.


The skillful manner in which the lights fall upon this picture, brings out in detail the most interesting parts of the view, and particularly broken pillars which stand in the center of the dilapidated  pavement.

In order to give you more interest in the picture you have to vary the effects of light. This, though a legitimate object in art, in aiding reality of the scene, for when exploring these desolate ruins could ever fancy you should find an illustration of these beautiful eastern fiction among the tombs of these Scottish chieftains? 

I repeat that the general effect of Daguerre's "Ruin of Holyrood Chapel" is beautiful owing to the care and skill of distribution of the light and shadows and one of my favorite pieces of art!



Reviewed by Nadine Powell-Hjort on Thursday 30 October 2014

Monday, 27 October 2014

The Gang Display - David









Helloooo :)

Following my last post on 'The Gang' display I saw at The Walker I found a common influence to Robert Mapplethorpe's photography work and various other artists that I will discuss below.
Although I can't find the image that I will be referring to, the piece of work I will be discussing will be Catherine Opie's "David".

Not long ago I did an essay on how Robert Mapplethorpe was influenced by Renaissance artists, and with this it made me think about contrasts and oppositions of other artists and exhibitions I have seen recently and in this case 'The Gang' display.

These are my findings:
Robert Mapplethorpe

In the article “Galleria dell'Accademia Presents Robert Mapplethorpe Perfection in Form” Robert Mapplethorpe’s art dictates the direction of Michelangelo’s David, the aim is to show that the photographer still best-known as the chronicler of New York’s S&M scene in the 1970s was actually the heir to the classical tradition.

Primary source Mapplethorpe’s muse and companion Patti Smith boasts about his admiration towards renaissance sculptor Michelangelo.  Mapplethorpe’s approach to photography and his subjects is one that has a focus on tonality – hence his choice to shoot in black-and-white – and the celebration of the human body, making clear references to classical antiquity. 

Although the connection to Opie's "David" is different due to the color editing of Sepia tones compared to Mapplethorpe's approach in black and white not only shows to me that he was influenced heavily by classicism whereas Opie could be a clear example of post-modernism in terms of using technology to edit and distinguish the form of her life model into a purpose that sets its sights on political and social aspects of the queer theory.

In contrast, Mapplethorpe’s images of Thomas, a nude model pressing his hands and feet against the edges of a circle, possess a taut, deliberate poise that is mannered rather than moving. But other sitters, such as Andy Warhol and David Hockney, are also associated to elements in an assemblage of shape, light and line by the rigorous angles and shadows of the backgrounds. 

Opie's work can easily be compared to Mapplethorpe's in terms of not only the background color contrasting in black and white but they share similar interests in eroticism, actions: postures and motions. This similarity is shown in "Lisa Lyon" (1984) 

Tuesday, 14 October 2014

'The Gang' Display

#opiethegang

'The Gang: Photographs by Catherine Opie' is an exhibition of work by the renowned American artist.
The iconic image The Gang, presented to the Walker by the Contemporary Art Society with the support of the gallery, gives the exhibition its name and is one of 25 photographs by Opie on display. It features Opie’s friends photographed together in a humorous pose that is defiant, yet tender.

The exhibition celebrates the acquisition by the Walker Art Gallery of Opie’s photograph, ‘The Gang’. This was presented by the Contemporary Art Society with the support of funding from the Gallery in 2014.
Opie’s portraits of her friends from the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer community subvert American archetypes. Opie’s attempt to make visible a misunderstood sector of American culture, produces a body of work that is at times explicit and challenging in its content, but also playful and intimate.

Catherine Opie says,
“I made The Gang after individually shooting them all for the 1991 body of work, Being and Having. It was great to see them with their mustaches and I couldn't resist making some group photos of them… I think it is perfect in celebrating Homotopia as this work was made 20 years ago, in relationship to visibility within my own queer community. It is good to celebrate and reflect on equality that has been achieved and celebrated as well as the fight in regards to homophobia that continues.”
 One word of opinion when I first saw this display was that it was unusual. But the more I looked into it I found the contrast between the color and black and white versions more intense and interesting in terms of documenting social/political aspects on sexuality.
Her work is informed by her identity as an out lesbian which balances her personal and political views. Her assertive portraits bring queers to a forefront that is normally silenced by societal norms.